Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for MRI-based Brain Tumor Classification

Authors

  • Muhammad Naufal Erza Farandi Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Azah Kamilah Muda Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Sri Winarno Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Halizah Basiron Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62411/faith.3048-3719-257

Keywords:

Brain Tumor Classification, Convolutional Neural Networks, Deep Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Image Analysis, Model Complexity, Residual Connections, U-Net

Abstract

Brain tumor detection using deep learning has become a focus of research due to its potential to improve patient diagnosis and management. This study presents a comparative analysis to evaluate how the fundamental design philosophies of convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, namely sequential (VGG16), residual (ResNet50), and encoder-decoder (U-Net), influence performance on brain tumor classification tasks using a public MRI dataset. The data undergoes preprocessing, including normalization, data augmentation, and division into training and testing subsets. Evaluation is conducted using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score metrics. The results show that ResNet50 consistently outperforms other architectures with an average accuracy of 95.35%, followed by VGG16 (93.93%). Conversely, U-Net, designed for segmentation, demonstrates the lowest performance (79%). The superiority of ResNet50 highlights the benefits of residual connections in addressing the vanishing gradient problem for classification tasks. The poor performance of U-Net confirms the hypothesis that architectural suitability for a specific task is more critical than complexity alone. This study highlights the strength of ResNet50 as a reliable approach for brain tumor classification. It underscores the importance of selecting an architecture specifically designed for the intended medical image analysis task. In addition, an analysis of model complexity and computational efficiency was conducted, showing that while ResNet50 achieved the highest accuracy, VGG16 provided a more favorable trade-off between performance and training time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Naufal Erza Farandi, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang 50131, Indonesia

Azah Kamilah Muda, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malacca 76100, Malaysia

Sri Winarno, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang 50131, Indonesia

Halizah Basiron, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malacca 76100, Malaysia

References

Z. Akkus, A. Galimzianova, A. Hoogi, D. L. Rubin, and B. J. Erickson, “Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions,” J. Digit. Imaging, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 449–459, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9983-4.

D. N. Louis et al., “The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary,” Acta Neuropathol., vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 803–820, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.

A. Işın, C. Direkoğlu, and M. Şah, “Review of MRI-based Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning Methods,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 102, pp. 317–324, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.407.

G. S. Tandel et al., “A Review on a Deep Learning Perspective in Brain Cancer Classification,” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 111, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/cancers11010111.

K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition,” in arXiv, Apr. 2015, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.

O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, 2015, pp. 234–241. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.

T. Zhou, S. Ruan, and S. Canu, “A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion,” Array, vol. 3–4, p. 100004, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.array.2019.100004.

A. S. Lundervold and A. Lundervold, “An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI,” Z. Med. Phys., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 102–127, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002.

H. Ali Khan, W. Jue, M. Mushtaq, and M. Umer Mushtaq, “Brain tumor classification in MRI image using convolutional neural network,” Math. Biosci. Eng., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 6203–6216, 2020, doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020328.

Z. Zhou, M. M. Rahman Siddiquee, N. Tajbakhsh, and J. Liang, “UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation,” in Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support, 2018, pp. 3–11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_1.

P. Wesseling and D. Capper, “WHO 2016 Classification of gliomas,” Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 139–150, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1111/nan.12432.

M. F. Ahamed et al., “A review on brain tumor segmentation based on deep learning methods with federated learning techniques,” Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., vol. 110, p. 102313, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102313.

D. N. Louis et al., “The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary,” Neuro. Oncol., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1231–1251, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.

E. M. Younis, I. A. Ibrahim, M. N. Mahmoud, and A. M. Albarrak, “Hybrid of VGG-16 and FTVT-b16 Models to Enhance Brain Tumors Classification Using MRI Images,” Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 16, p. 2014, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162014.

Q. T. Ostrom, N. Patil, G. Cioffi, K. Waite, C. Kruchko, and J. S. Barnholtz-Sloan, “CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013–2017,” Neuro. Oncol., vol. 22, no. Supplement_1, pp. iv1–iv96, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa200.

A. Sanapala, A. Sanapala, and P. Naveena, “A Review On Image Based Diagnosis UsingResNet-50,” Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 796–808, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR24A3421.pdf

P. Sabeghi et al., “Advances in Neuro-Oncological Imaging: An Update on Diagnostic Approach to Brain Tumors,” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 3, p. 576, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/cancers16030576.

W. Jiangtao, N. I. R. Ruhaiyem, and F. Panpan, “A Comprehensive Review of U‐Net and Its Variants: Advances and Applications in Medical Image Segmentation,” IET Image Process., vol. 19, no. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1049/ipr2.70019.

G. Litjens et al., “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 42, pp. 60–88, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005.

D. Shen, G. Wu, and H.-I. Suk, “Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 221–248, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442.

R. Kaifi, “A Review of Recent Advances in Brain Tumor Diagnosis Based on AI-Based Classification,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 3007, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13183007.

R. Baimukashev, S. Kadyrov, and C. Turan, “Systematic Survey of Deep Fuzzy Computer Vision in Biomedical Research,” Fuzzy Inf. Eng., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 220–243, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.26599/FIE.2024.9270043.

A. Al‑Rahbi, O. Al-Mahrouqi, and T. Al‑Saadi, “Uses of artificial intelligence in glioma: A systematic review,” Med. Int., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 40, May 2024, doi: 10.3892/mi.2024.164.

U. A. Siddiqui et al., “Quality assessment of critical and non-critical domains of systematic reviews on artificial intelligence in gliomas using AMSTAR II: A systematic review,” J. Clin. Neurosci., vol. 131, p. 110926, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110926.

S. Das, O. F. M. R. R. Aranya, and N. N. Labiba, “Brain Tumor Classification Using Convolutional Neural Network,” in 2019 1st International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT), May 2019, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICASERT.2019.8934603.

A. Younis, L. Qiang, C. O. Nyatega, M. J. Adamu, and H. B. Kawuwa, “Brain Tumor Analysis Using Deep Learning and VGG-16 Ensembling Learning Approaches,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 14, p. 7282, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12147282.

C. Srinivas et al., “Deep Transfer Learning Approaches in Performance Analysis of Brain Tumor Classification Using MRI Images,” J. Healthc. Eng., vol. 2022, pp. 1–17, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3264367.

P. Agrawal, N. Katal, and N. Hooda, “Segmentation and classification of brain tumor using 3D-UNet deep neural networks,” Int. J. Cogn. Comput. Eng., vol. 3, pp. 199–210, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcce.2022.11.001.

S. Tammina, “Transfer learning using VGG-16 with Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Classifying Images,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., vol. 9, no. 10, p. p9420, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.29322/IJSRP.9.10.2019.p9420.

S. Targ, D. Almeida, and K. Lyman, “Resnet in Resnet: Generalizing Residual Architectures,” arXiv. Mar. 25, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08029

W. Weng and X. Zhu, “INet: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 16591–16603, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053408.

B. A. Llaca-Sanchez, D. S. Marın-Chavez, and A. Vilchis-yubi, “Detection and Classification of Brain Tumors in MRIs Using CNNs,” Res. Comput. Sci., vol. 153, no. 12, pp. 5–18, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.rcs.cic.ipn.mx/2024_153_12/Detection and Classification of Brain Tumors in MRIs Using CNNs.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

How to Cite

[1]
M. N. E. Farandi, A. K. Muda, S. Winarno, and H. Basiron, “Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for MRI-based Brain Tumor Classification”, J. Fut. Artif. Intell. Tech., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 370–387, Sep. 2025.

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.